Advert
 
  logo  
About Face!

The basic premise of this book is that on a number of key issues society is heading in the wrong direction. Not just moving slightly off course, but heading in the diametrically opposite direction to the course of travel we need to be if we are to solve some fundamental development problems in the world. Which problems? Lack of economic development and the continued existence of poverty in large parts of the developing world; a refusal to adopt the measures necessary to fight the scourge of malaria; and the continued and sustained attempt to de-industrialise the successful economies of the West. And what links these disparate themes, according to the authors, is a set of policies driven by the anti-scientific dogmas of environmentalism, particularly with regards to climate change and the war on carbon dioxide (CO2).

How did things get to this state? The opening chapter asks that question and suggests, like Christopher Booker's and Richard North's 'Scared To Death', that there is a familiar pattern at work. First there is the creation of a scare story - a dooms-day scenario of imminent disaster - and then there is a clamour for politicians to 'do something' and then the policies are put into place to avert the threatened disaster. Examples cited in the text include Paul Ehrlich's predictions of mass starvation and ecological Armageddon due to over-population; Rachel Carson's 'Silent Spring' and the rush to ban DDT, a safe and effective chemical to control malaria; and of course the biggest and most successful scare story ever, the threat of catastrophic man-made global warming, which remains the dominant and defining feature of much of our public policy in the West.

authors also address in some detail. They authors describe the origins of the scare about DDT, particularly with Carson's monumentally popular 'Silent Spring'. Not only did this kick start the nascent 'green movement', it also created a blue-print that has been successfully copied again and again. Without 'Silent Spring' would there have been 'An Inconvenient Truth'? [Continued]

Abuse, Cocaine and Soft Furnishings

Abuse, Cocaine and Soft Furnishings is both a thriller and a love story set in Lincoln and Istanbul. This is a first novel from Andrew Sparke and is certainly impressive as such; I was hooked from the first page. He has a great writing style - short sentences that move the story along, while also managing to somehow to be pretty evocative, giving substance to the settings, particularly of Lincoln. I like writing that makes me feel I know where I am and this does - not through lengthy description, but by making each word count. There is definitely a sense that the author has an intimacy with the characters and places, which gives them a ring of truth.

Written from the viewpoint of the main character (and I've only just realised that we never learn his name, which I guess is one of the reasons we really feel we're in his head), the story moves backwards and forwards from past to present enabling the reader to gradually make sense of present events in relation to the past, as the story continues to unfold. It's a neat hook that keeps the reader gripped, wanting to find out why certain things happened at the same time as wanting to know what the outcome will be. One criticism I have is that there are a couple of times when this to-ing and fro-ing becomes confusing.

The love story begins in the past, in the second chapter of the book and adds another perspective as it intertwines with the twists and turns of the thriller aspect of the book. [Continued]
The Great Persuasion

Even now, in an atmosphere where politicians routinely earn plaudits for attacking bankers, business and free markets, there seems to be no big public appetite central planning or more big government. Indeed, despite the various economic crises we have endured since 2008, the intellectual case for free markets and ideological capitalism still seems very strong. Free market think tanks abound, still making the case for smaller government and the superiority of market solutions over centrally managed state solutions. However, this was not always the case, indeed, there was a time early in the twentieth century when the voice of free marketeers was drowned out by the greater clamour of the intellectually ascendant case for central planning - whether in the form of Soviet style communism, Western European social democracy or, latter, Keynesian central management of the economy.

This change in intellectual atmosphere was due, in no small part, to the activities of the Mont Pelerin Society (MPS), a small group of academics and business leaders organised in support of 'classical liberalism' (not to be confused with modern liberalism, which is in many respects diametrically opposed to classical liberalism). In 'The Great Persuasion', Angus Burgin charts the rise of the MPS and the activities of its founders and leading lights, including FA Hayek and Milton Friedman, in rehabilitating belief in the efficacy of market solutions following the Great Depression and the consequent dominance of the anti-market position. While this is not the only focus in the book, Burgin affords it a central place in the historical narrative.

While for some on the Left, the MPS and the plethora of think tanks and lobby groups which have emerged since the 1950s as champions of free market ideas might seem to be dogmatic and triumphalist, the beginnings were far more tentative. While critical of statism and central planning, many of those involved in the renaissance of 'classic liberalism' were also critical to some degree with existing liberal ideas. Far from being a dogmatic or propagandist group, in the founding decade the organisation was home to a broad range of individuals with differing views on politics, the role of the state, economic organisation and so on. United as they were by a distrust of the state, this was by no means a group that we would now characterise as libertarian. [Continued]
The 2-Day Diet

It may seem odd to find a review of a diet book on a book review site like this, but there are good reasons for looking at this book. Firstly, it's an accepted fact that there is a strong link between obesity, metabolism and cancer. Secondly, there is an increasing view among some researchers that cancer is a metabolic syndrome, and that cancers are associated with a whole set of metabolic changes, both in the tumour and the surrounding tissues. Cancer and metabolism, and therefore diet, are inextricably linked. And there is increasing evidence that altering diet can impact cancer treatments, for example in the work that looked at chemotherapy response and fasting. There is another reason for looking at this book - the authors (Professor Tony Howell and Dr Michelle Harvie) are both working in breast cancer research, and are involved specifically in helping patients reduce their chances of getting the disease or reducing the risk of recurrence.

That said, this is primarily a book about diets and losing weight rather than a book specifically about cancer. Although the links to cancer are there in the text, and many of the patient stories include mention of cancer, the main aim is to help readers lose weight and keep it off. And, in doing so, to reap the overall health benefits across the board.

So, what is the 2-day Diet, and how does it differ from the thousands of other diet books on the market? A key point to make up front is that this is a diet that's been backed up by clinical data. There are no celebrity endorsements, no one selling expensive supplements or foods, no hand waving or bold claims unsupported by evidence. This is a diet that has been shown to work, it's that simple. Simple too is the basic idea behind the diet - it's simpler to stick to a strict diet for two days per week than it is for seven. And, importantly, the changes induced by a strict two day a week diet are significant enough to cause changes in body weight, glucose tolerance, mood and so on. [Continued]
Interview With Donna Laframboise
Donna Laframboise, author of The Delinquent Teenager Who Was Mistaken for the World's Top Climate Expert, responds to questions on the controversies surrounding her book, the responses to it and the politics of climate change. [Continued]
Interview With Denis Gingras
Denis Gingras, co-author of Foods to Fight Cancer, responds to questions on the food, life-style and the role of diet in preventing and treating cancer [Continued]
Interview With Christopher Booker
Christopher Booker, co-author of Scared To Death, responds to questions on global warming, health scares, the mass media and responses to his book in this interview with LondonBookReview.com [Continued]
Forthcoming Reviews
Living Economics by Peter Boetkke
Other Recent Reviews
XML/RSS FeedRSS Feed Mailto: LondonBookReview.com
Site design by viper69 productions - All contents copyright of authors. No copying for commercial use allowed. Site © 2006 - 2013.